Bitstamp Hack

TOTAL LOST $5.3M
Medium Access Control

Summarize with AI

Affected Chain 2015 Incident surface
Recovered - No recovery reported
All-Time Rank #420 By amount stolen
Protocol Type CEX Target category

Incident Overview

The attacked contacted with Bitstamp team and sent a number of attachments via email. One of these, UPE_application_form.doc, contained obfuscated malicious VBA script. When opened, this script ran automatically and pulled down a malicious file from IP address 185.31.209.145, thereby compromising the machine. Ultimately, the attackers were able to access two servers containing the wallet.dat file for Bitstamp’s hot wallet and the passphrase for that file.

On 4th January, the attacker drained the Bitstamp wallet.

Bitstamp lost 18,866 BTC from its hot wallet, worth approximately $5,263,614 at a time when the price of bitcoin averaged $279.

Incident Report

Protocol / Project Bitstamp
Date of Incident
Attack Technique Access Control
Classification CeFi

Protocol Information

Protocol Type CEX
Official Website www.bitstamp.net/
Protocol Twitter/X @Bitstamp
Team Public / Doxxed
Source Code Unverified

Market Context at Time of Hack

Token Categories
Hybrid - PoW & PoS Scrypt

What the Attacker Needed to Succeed

Understanding the prerequisites for this type of attack helps auditors identify protocols that are most at risk and helps developers build better defenses.

Technical Knowledge Operational-security tradecraft (phishing, malware, leaked seed phrases, or insider access) to obtain treasury signing authority
Capital Required Minimal capital - only enough to cover gas while draining the compromised accounts
On-Chain Access Valid signing authority over the compromised wallets / multisig signers, allowing direct transfer of funds or stake authorization
Target Reconnaissance Identification of Bitstamp's high-value treasury accounts and the authority / multisig structure controlling them
Execution Speed Speed to drain the compromised accounts before the team detects the breach and revokes signing authority or freezes the assets
Obfuscation Plan A strategy to launder and move stolen funds - typically through mixers, cross-chain bridges, or decentralized DEX swaps to resist tracing

What Auditors Should Check

Could this have been caught in audit? Likely β€” with a thorough Access Control audit checklist and test coverage

If you're auditing a protocol with similar architecture to Bitstamp, these are the critical security checks that could have prevented this incident (January 2015).

  • Verify all logic paths related to Access Control are guarded by proper access controls and input validation - see the Access Control Attacks attack class for patterns
  • Review privileged functions (owner, admin, governance) for potential abuse vectors - centralization risks should be documented and bounded with timelocks or multi-sigs

Master these auditing techniques with hands-on labs and real exploit scenarios in the Smart Contract Hacking course.

Free Trial

Related Attack Classes

The technique used in this hack maps to these vulnerability classes in our security curriculum:

See all Access Control Attacks examples β†’

Sources & References

Learn to Prevent the Next Bitstamp

The Bitstamp hack is one of many attacks that skilled auditors are trained to detect before deployment. Master real exploit patterns and defense techniques with hands-on Web3 security training.

Recreate exploit patterns safely Free Trial