LianGo Protocol Hack

TOTAL LOST $1.6M
Medium Access Control

Summarize with AI

Affected Chain 2023 Incident surface
Recovered - No recovery reported
All-Time Rank #698 By amount stolen
Auditors 2 Prior security audits

Incident Overview

LianGo Protocol was exploited via access control. The attacker compromised private keys and was able to receive $LGT tokens from the project's pool for roughly 1,600,000 $USD

LianGo Protocol is a decentralized consume-as-mine payment protocol. The project has multiple contracts such as $LGT token contract and LGT Pool. The deployer address of the protocol was compromised, which allowed the exploiter to add a malicious pool to the Pool contract, and drain $LGT tokens worth about 1,600,000 $USD.

The stolen tokens were sold on the PancakeSwap which affected the $LGT token price, which has dropped 97%.

Attacker address:

https://bscscan.com/address/0x36d17393…38c28a

Malicious transactions:

https://bscscan.com/tx/0xbdd83d5d…073953

https://bscscan.com/tx/0x29c29e9f…1e67d6

Incident Report

Protocol / Project LianGo Protocol
Date of Incident
Attack Technique Access Control
Classification Token

Protocol Information

Protocol Type Liquid Restaking
Affected Token LGT
Official Website liangopro.com/
Protocol Twitter/X @LianGoProtocol
Team Anonymous
Source Code Verified On-Chain

Market Context at Time of Hack

Token Categories
Cardano Ecosystem

What the Attacker Needed to Succeed

Understanding the prerequisites for this type of attack helps auditors identify protocols that are most at risk and helps developers build better defenses.

Technical Knowledge Operational-security tradecraft (phishing, malware, leaked seed phrases, or insider access) to obtain treasury signing authority
Capital Required Minimal capital - only enough to cover gas while draining the compromised accounts
On-Chain Access Valid signing authority over the compromised wallets / multisig signers, allowing direct transfer of funds or stake authorization
Target Reconnaissance Identification of LianGo Protocol's high-value treasury accounts and the authority / multisig structure controlling them
Execution Speed Speed to drain the compromised accounts before the team detects the breach and revokes signing authority or freezes the assets
Obfuscation Plan A strategy to launder and move stolen funds - typically through mixers, cross-chain bridges, or decentralized DEX swaps to resist tracing

What Auditors Should Check

Could this have been caught in audit? Likely — with a thorough Access Control audit checklist and test coverage
Audited by Audit Report 1, Audit Report 2 — still lost $1.6M. Prior audits don't guarantee safety, especially after post-audit code changes.

If you're auditing a protocol with similar architecture to LianGo Protocol, these are the critical security checks that could have prevented this incident (February 2023).

  • Verify all logic paths related to Access Control are guarded by proper access controls and input validation - see the Access Control Attacks attack class for patterns
  • Review privileged functions (owner, admin, governance) for potential abuse vectors - centralization risks should be documented and bounded with timelocks or multi-sigs

Master these auditing techniques with hands-on labs and real exploit scenarios in the Smart Contract Hacking course.

Free Trial

Security Audit History

Related Attack Classes

The technique used in this hack maps to these vulnerability classes in our security curriculum:

See all Access Control Attacks examples →

Sources & References

Learn to Prevent the Next LianGo Protocol

The LianGo Protocol hack is one of many attacks that skilled auditors are trained to detect before deployment. Master real exploit patterns and defense techniques with hands-on Web3 security training.

Recreate exploit patterns safely Free Trial