UXLINK Hack

TOTAL LOST $48.0M
High #130 All-Time Delegatecall Exploit / Access Control arbitrum ethereum
Affected Chain arbitrum 2 chains affected
Recovered - No recovery reported
All-Time Rank #130 By amount stolen
Auditors 1 Prior security audit

Incident Overview

On September 22, 2025, UXLINK, a decentralized social project, suffered a multi-signature wallet exploit resulting in over $21.7 million in stolen assets. The attacker gained unauthorized minting rights and issued an additional 1 billion UXLINK tokens, causing the token price to plummet 70%. In an unusual twist, the original hacker later lost approximately $48 million worth of UXLINK tokens to a secondary phishing attack.

The attack began with a security breach of UXLINK's multi-signature wallet system where the attacker used delegateCall to remove administrator privileges, called addOwnerWithThreshold to gain control, and transferred approximately $11.3 million in various assets including $4 million USDT, $500,000 USDC, 3.7 WBTC, and 25 ETH. The attacker then gained minting rights and issued 1 billion additional UXLINK tokens on Arbitrum, severely diluting the token supply. UXLINK responded by coordinating with major exchanges to freeze suspicious deposits and initiated a token swap plan while developing compensation measures for affected users.

In a rare "hacker-on-hacker" crime, the original attacker subsequently fell victim to an Inferno Drainer phishing attack, losing approximately 542 million UXLINK tokens (worth about $48 million) to secondary criminals.

Attacker Addresses:

0xaC77B44A…2ef931

0x5210BFdf…C59309

0x7277c705…5Bed00

Incident Report

Protocol / Project UXLINK
Date of Incident
Affected Chain(s) arbitrum ethereum
Attack Technique Delegatecall Exploit / Access Control
Classification Protocol Logic / Other
Primary Source View Post-Mortem

Protocol Information

Protocol Type SoFi
Smart Contract Language Solidity
Official Website www.uxlink.io/
Protocol Twitter/X @UXLINKofficial
Team Anonymous
Source Code Unverified

Market Context at Time of Hack

Token Price at Hack $0.3221
Market Cap at Hack $154.5M
% of Market Cap Stolen 31.06%
Token Categories
SocialFi Ethereum Ecosystem

What the Attacker Needed to Succeed

Understanding the prerequisites for this type of attack helps auditors identify protocols that are most at risk and helps developers build better defenses.

Technical Knowledge Operational-security tradecraft (phishing, malware, leaked seed phrases, or insider access) to obtain treasury signing authority
Capital Required Minimal capital - only enough to cover gas while draining the compromised accounts
On-Chain Access Valid signing authority over the compromised wallets / multisig signers, allowing direct transfer of funds or stake authorization
Target Reconnaissance Identification of UXLINK's high-value treasury accounts and the authority / multisig structure controlling them
Execution Speed Speed to drain the compromised accounts before the team detects the breach and revokes signing authority or freezes the assets
Obfuscation Plan A strategy to launder and move stolen funds - typically through mixers, cross-chain bridges, or decentralized DEX swaps to resist tracing

What Auditors Should Check

Could this have been caught in audit? Likely — with a thorough Delegatecall Exploit / Access Control audit checklist and test coverage
Audited by Audit Report 1 — still lost $48.0M. Prior audits don't guarantee safety, especially after post-audit code changes.

If you're auditing a protocol with similar architecture to UXLINK, these are the critical security checks that could have prevented this incident (September 2025).

  • Verify all logic paths related to Delegatecall Exploit / Access Control are guarded by proper access controls and input validation - see the Access Control Attacks attack class for patterns
  • Review privileged functions (owner, admin, governance) for potential abuse vectors - centralization risks should be documented and bounded with timelocks or multi-sigs

Master these auditing techniques with hands-on labs and real exploit scenarios in the Smart Contract Hacking course.

Free Trial

Security Audit History

Related Attack Classes

The technique used in this hack maps to these vulnerability classes in our security curriculum:

See all Access Control Attacks examples →

Sources & References

Learn to Prevent the Next UXLINK

The UXLINK hack is one of many attacks that skilled auditors are trained to detect before deployment. Master real exploit patterns and defense techniques with hands-on Web3 security training.

Recreate exploit patterns safely Free Trial