Carol Protocol Hack

TOTAL LOST $61K
Low Flash Loan Attack

Summarize with AI

Affected Chain 2023 Incident surface
Recovered - No recovery reported
All-Time Rank #1667 By amount stolen
Auditors 1 Prior security audit

Incident Overview

Carol Protocol suffers flash loan exploit, resulting in a loss of $61,164 USD (29.92 ETH).

On November 30th, 2023, Carol Protocol, a project running on the Base chain, experienced a flash loan exploit due to a smart contract vulnerability. The root cause of this exploit was identified as manipulation of the stake amount. The contract's design flaw lies in its reliance on Uniswap Pair Balance to determine user balances, a metric that is susceptible to manipulation.

The stolen funds were distributed between multiple addresses and then transferred to another scammer's EOA. The total loss amounted to $61,164 USD, equivalent to 29.92 ETH.

Binance Smart Chain:

Attacker address:

https://basescan.org/address/0x5AA27D55…bC3144

Funds Holder as of Dec 14, 2023:

https://basescan.org/address/0xcDd37Ada…4A2af2

Malicious transactions:

https://basescan.org/tx/0xd962d397…b4185c

Malicious contract:

https://basescan.org/address/0xc4566ae9…780b2c

Incident Report

Protocol / Project Carol Protocol
Date of Incident
Attack Technique Flash Loan Attack
Classification Other
Primary Source View Post-Mortem

Protocol Information

Protocol Type Liquid Staking
Affected Token CAROL
Official Website carol.finance/bonding
Protocol Twitter/X @carolprotocol
Team Anonymous
Source Code Verified On-Chain

Market Context at Time of Hack

Token Categories
Ethereum Ecosystem Base Ecosystem

What the Attacker Needed to Succeed

Understanding the prerequisites for this type of attack helps auditors identify protocols that are most at risk and helps developers build better defenses.

Technical Knowledge Deep understanding of flash loan attack and Solidity and EVM internals
Capital Required Flash loan capital (borrowed atomically, zero upfront cost)
On-Chain Access Ability to interact with smart contracts and deploy a custom exploit contract
Protocol Analysis Identification of the exploitable vulnerability in Carol Protocol's contract logic - root cause: other
Execution Speed Precise transaction ordering and timing to exploit the vulnerability within a single atomic block
Obfuscation Plan A strategy to launder and move stolen funds - typically through mixers, cross-chain bridges, or decentralized DEX swaps to resist tracing

What Auditors Should Check

Could this have been caught in audit? Yes — skilled auditors routinely flag Flash Loan Attack vulnerabilities in code review
Audited by Audit Report 1 — still lost $61K. Prior audits don't guarantee safety, especially after post-audit code changes.

If you're auditing a protocol with similar architecture to Carol Protocol, these are the critical security checks that could have prevented this incident (November 2023).

  • Verify all logic paths related to Flash Loan Attack are guarded by proper access controls and input validation - see the Flash Loans Attacks attack class for patterns
  • Review privileged functions (owner, admin, governance) for potential abuse vectors - centralization risks should be documented and bounded with timelocks or multi-sigs

Master these auditing techniques with hands-on labs and real exploit scenarios in the Smart Contract Hacking course.

Free Trial

Security Audit History

Related Attack Classes

The technique used in this hack maps to these vulnerability classes in our security curriculum:

See all Flash Loans Attacks examples →

Sources & References

Learn to Prevent the Next Carol Protocol

The Carol Protocol hack is one of many attacks that skilled auditors are trained to detect before deployment. Master real exploit patterns and defense techniques with hands-on Web3 security training.

Recreate exploit patterns safely Free Trial