Cezar Hard Fork Hack

TOTAL LOST $399K
Low Rugpull

Summarize with AI

Affected Chain 2022 Incident surface
Recovered - No recovery reported
All-Time Rank #1075 By amount stolen
Protocol Type Exit Scam/Rugpull Target category

Incident Overview

Cesar Hard Fork was rugpulled by the token deployer for over 398,748 $USD. The scammers used the privileged mint function.

Cesar Hard Fork is a BEP20 token trading on PancakeSwap. There are two copycat tokens with related deployers. Both $Cesar tokens were rugpulled by the deployers.

rewardHolders() privileged function allowed to mint an unlimited amount of $Cesar tokens to the contract owner. Consequently, pools were drained. The stolen funds accumulated in a single EOA address, and reached 1,212 $BNB in total which is worth 398,748 $USD at the moment.

The accumulated amount was transferred through TornadoCash. Cesar Hard Fork is not a single project of the scammers.

Scammer addresses:

https://bscscan.com/address/0xdb783c18…a83b83

https://bscscan.com/address/0x4925b8e1…da8726

Funds accumulated address:

https://bscscan.com/address/0x2bb4edcf…f7c119

Drain transaction example:

https://bscscan.com/tx/0x48181309…e7381f

Incident Report

Protocol / Project Cezar Hard Fork
Date of Incident
Attack Technique Rugpull
Classification Token
Primary Source View Post-Mortem

Protocol Information

Protocol Type Exit Scam/Rugpull
Affected Token Cezar
Team Anonymous
Source Code Verified On-Chain

What the Attacker Needed to Succeed

Understanding the prerequisites for this type of attack helps auditors identify protocols that are most at risk and helps developers build better defenses.

Technical Knowledge Deep understanding of rugpull and Solidity and EVM internals
Capital Required Seed capital to cover gas and initial position setup
On-Chain Access Ability to interact with smart contracts and deploy a custom exploit contract
Protocol Analysis Identification of the exploitable vulnerability in Cezar Hard Fork's contract logic - root cause: token
Execution Speed Precise transaction ordering and timing to exploit the vulnerability within a single atomic block
Obfuscation Plan A strategy to launder and move stolen funds - typically through mixers, cross-chain bridges, or decentralized DEX swaps to resist tracing

What Auditors Should Check

Could this have been caught in audit? Hard to catch — private key / OpSec failures are outside smart contract audit scope

If you're auditing a protocol with similar architecture to Cezar Hard Fork, these are the critical security checks that could have prevented this incident (November 2022).

  • Verify all logic paths related to Rugpull are guarded by proper access controls and input validation
  • Review privileged functions (owner, admin, governance) for potential abuse vectors - centralization risks should be documented and bounded with timelocks or multi-sigs

Master these auditing techniques with hands-on labs and real exploit scenarios in the Smart Contract Hacking course.

Free Trial

Sources & References

Learn to Prevent the Next Cezar Hard Fork

The Cezar Hard Fork hack is one of many attacks that skilled auditors are trained to detect before deployment. Master real exploit patterns and defense techniques with hands-on Web3 security training.

Recreate exploit patterns safely Free Trial