CryptoBottle Hack

TOTAL LOST $527K
Low Other

Summarize with AI

Affected Chain 2024 Incident surface
Recovered - No recovery reported
All-Time Rank #986 By amount stolen
Protocol Type Exploit/Other Target category

Incident Overview

In October 2024, CryptoBottle on Polygon was exploited three times, resulting in total losses of approximately $527k.

The Navigator’s Adventage contract allowed users to acquire NAS tokens through minting or swapping, controlled by the fixedPriceEnabled variable. However, public functions permitted anyone to toggle this variable. The attacker set fixedPriceEnabled to true, enabling the mint function and disabling the balance check in swap(). They conducted swaps where 1 USDT was exchanged for millions of NAS tokens. After accumulating NAS, they toggled fixedPriceEnabled back to false, sold the tokens, and drained the USDT liquidity.

The attacker ultimately transferred 493,652 USDT to a wallet linked to a prior CryptoBottle exploit on October 22. The funds remain in that wallet at the time of reporting.

Incident Report

Protocol / Project CryptoBottle
Date of Incident
Attack Technique Other
Classification NFT
Primary Source View Post-Mortem

Protocol Information

Protocol Type Exploit/Other
Protocol Twitter/X @NFTCryptoBottle
Team Anonymous
Source Code Unverified

Market Context at Time of Hack

What the Attacker Needed to Succeed

Understanding the prerequisites for this type of attack helps auditors identify protocols that are most at risk and helps developers build better defenses.

Technical Knowledge Deep understanding of other and Solidity and EVM internals
Capital Required Seed capital to cover gas and initial position setup
On-Chain Access Ability to interact with smart contracts and deploy a custom exploit contract
Protocol Analysis Identification of the exploitable vulnerability in CryptoBottle's contract logic - root cause: nft
Execution Speed Precise transaction ordering and timing to exploit the vulnerability within a single atomic block
Obfuscation Plan A strategy to launder and move stolen funds - typically through mixers, cross-chain bridges, or decentralized DEX swaps to resist tracing

What Auditors Should Check

Could this have been caught in audit? Likely — with a thorough Other audit checklist and test coverage

If you're auditing a protocol with similar architecture to CryptoBottle, these are the critical security checks that could have prevented this incident (February 2024).

  • Verify all logic paths related to Other are guarded by proper access controls and input validation
  • Review privileged functions (owner, admin, governance) for potential abuse vectors - centralization risks should be documented and bounded with timelocks or multi-sigs

Master these auditing techniques with hands-on labs and real exploit scenarios in the Smart Contract Hacking course.

Free Trial

Sources & References

Learn to Prevent the Next CryptoBottle

The CryptoBottle hack is one of many attacks that skilled auditors are trained to detect before deployment. Master real exploit patterns and defense techniques with hands-on Web3 security training.

Recreate exploit patterns safely Free Trial