CUT token Hack

TOTAL LOST $1.4M
Medium Flash Loan Attack

Summarize with AI

Affected Chain 2024 Incident surface
Recovered - No recovery reported
All-Time Rank #750 By amount stolen
Protocol Type Exploit/Flash Loan Attack Target category

Incident Overview

On an unspecified date, the CUT token was exploited using a flash loan attack, resulting in a loss of approximately $1.4 million through manipulation of the BUSD-CUT PancakeSwap pair on the Binance Smart Chain.

The attacker exploited hidden functionality within the unverified contract ILPFutureYieldContract at address 0x0917914b…E31154. By manipulating this contract, the attacker used flash loans to exploit the BUSD-CUT trading pair on PancakeSwap. The malicious contract allowed them to manipulate the yield mechanism of the CUT token, enabling the unauthorized gain of roughly $1.4 million.

The exploited pair 0x83681F67…eD3249 was specifically targeted for the attack and should not be confused with a separate client using the same CUT ticker.

Exploiter:

https://bscscan.com/address/0x5766d1f03378f50c7c981c014ed5e5a8124f3

Incident Report

Protocol / Project CUT token
Date of Incident
Attack Technique Flash Loan Attack
Classification Token
Primary Source View Post-Mortem

Protocol Information

Protocol Type Exploit/Flash Loan Attack
Official Website www.drachmae.co.uk/
Protocol Twitter/X @E_Drachma
Team Anonymous
Source Code Unverified

Market Context at Time of Hack

What the Attacker Needed to Succeed

Understanding the prerequisites for this type of attack helps auditors identify protocols that are most at risk and helps developers build better defenses.

Technical Knowledge Deep understanding of flash loan attack and Solidity and EVM internals
Capital Required Flash loan capital (borrowed atomically, zero upfront cost)
On-Chain Access Ability to interact with smart contracts and deploy a custom exploit contract
Protocol Analysis Identification of the exploitable vulnerability in CUT token's contract logic - root cause: token
Execution Speed Precise transaction ordering and timing to exploit the vulnerability within a single atomic block
Obfuscation Plan A strategy to launder and move stolen funds - typically through mixers, cross-chain bridges, or decentralized DEX swaps to resist tracing

What Auditors Should Check

Could this have been caught in audit? Yes — skilled auditors routinely flag Flash Loan Attack vulnerabilities in code review

If you're auditing a protocol with similar architecture to CUT token, these are the critical security checks that could have prevented this incident (September 2024).

  • Verify all logic paths related to Flash Loan Attack are guarded by proper access controls and input validation - see the Flash Loans Attacks attack class for patterns
  • Review privileged functions (owner, admin, governance) for potential abuse vectors - centralization risks should be documented and bounded with timelocks or multi-sigs

Master these auditing techniques with hands-on labs and real exploit scenarios in the Smart Contract Hacking course.

Free Trial

Related Attack Classes

The technique used in this hack maps to these vulnerability classes in our security curriculum:

See all Flash Loans Attacks examples →

Sources & References

Learn to Prevent the Next CUT token

The CUT token hack is one of many attacks that skilled auditors are trained to detect before deployment. Master real exploit patterns and defense techniques with hands-on Web3 security training.

Recreate exploit patterns safely Free Trial