Iron Finance Hack

TOTAL LOST $170K
Low Other

Summarize with AI

Affected Chain 2020 Incident surface
Recovered - No recovery reported
All-Time Rank #1353 By amount stolen
Auditors 2 Prior security audits

Incident Overview

Two vFarms were exploited:

50% IRON — 50% SIL

50% IRON — 50% BUSD

A user who farmed in these two pools claimed all SIL rewards allocated for farming over the next 12 months and made a profit of around $170K by selling SIL for BUSD on vSwap.

Value DeFi team has upgraded FaaS, in which the reward rate is in normal integer instead of Ggwei as before. Iron.Finance team was unaware of the change and updated Iron vFarm pools with reward rate in Gwei. This caused the pools' rewards to inflated by 10^18 times.

The following address took advantage of the mistake and drained all SIL rewards and sold them to the market:

https://bscscan.com/address/0x69655181…63e9e5#tokentxns

Incident Report

Protocol / Project Iron Finance
Date of Incident
Attack Technique Other
Classification Stablecoin

Protocol Information

Protocol Type CDP
Affected Token SIL
Protocol Twitter/X @ironfinance

Market Context at Time of Hack

Token Categories
Services DeFi Ethereum Ecosystem Lending & Borrowing BoostVC Portfolio Fenbushi Capital Portfolio Hashkey Capital Portfolio

What the Attacker Needed to Succeed

Understanding the prerequisites for this type of attack helps auditors identify protocols that are most at risk and helps developers build better defenses.

Technical Knowledge Deep understanding of other and Solidity and EVM internals
Capital Required Seed capital to cover gas and initial position setup
On-Chain Access Ability to interact with smart contracts and deploy a custom exploit contract
Protocol Analysis Identification of the exploitable vulnerability in Iron Finance's contract logic - root cause: stablecoin
Execution Speed Precise transaction ordering and timing to exploit the vulnerability within a single atomic block
Obfuscation Plan A strategy to launder and move stolen funds - typically through mixers, cross-chain bridges, or decentralized DEX swaps to resist tracing

What Auditors Should Check

Could this have been caught in audit? Likely — with a thorough Other audit checklist and test coverage
Audited by Audit Report 1, Audit Report 2 — still lost $170K. Prior audits don't guarantee safety, especially after post-audit code changes.

If you're auditing a protocol with similar architecture to Iron Finance, these are the critical security checks that could have prevented this incident (March 2020).

  • Verify all logic paths related to Other are guarded by proper access controls and input validation
  • Review privileged functions (owner, admin, governance) for potential abuse vectors - centralization risks should be documented and bounded with timelocks or multi-sigs

Master these auditing techniques with hands-on labs and real exploit scenarios in the Smart Contract Hacking course.

Free Trial

Security Audit History

Sources & References

Learn to Prevent the Next Iron Finance

The Iron Finance hack is one of many attacks that skilled auditors are trained to detect before deployment. Master real exploit patterns and defense techniques with hands-on Web3 security training.

Recreate exploit patterns safely Free Trial