MetaDAO Hack

TOTAL LOST $2.8M
Medium Honeypot

Summarize with AI

Affected Chain 2021 Incident surface
Recovered - No recovery reported
All-Time Rank #575 By amount stolen
Protocol Type Services Target category

Incident Overview

The MetaDao Honeypot caused investors approx. $ 2,8 million in damages.

MetaDAO claimed to be the DAO of DAO´s, building a new decentralized universe when in fact the project was a Honeypot all along. The $META token was configured in such a way that it could not be sold on decentralized exchanges, meaning investors funds were trapped. The contract deployer added initial liquidity at:

https://etherscan.io/tx/0x2322e3e2…a52ac9

Once the project took on steam, the contract deployer unlocked liquidity and removed $ETH from the pair in the following example transactions:

https://etherscan.io/tx/0xfb75d381…9303c2

https://etherscan.io/tx/0xfb684e20…fb7c26

The Stolen funds were funneled through the Tornado Cash mixer, example transactions:

1) https://etherscan.io/tx/0xaaccf3a1…ff76db

2) https://etherscan.io/tx/0x998014ee…d09578

3) https://etherscan.io/tx/0xe1693a07…953292

The contract deployer possibly blocked token transfers:

https://honeypot.is/ethereum.html?address=0x6795a960…dd79e4

Incident Report

Protocol / Project MetaDAO
Date of Incident
Attack Technique Honeypot
Classification Token
Primary Source View Post-Mortem

Protocol Information

Protocol Type Services
Affected Token META
Official Website MetalL2.com
Protocol Twitter/X @metadao
Team Anonymous
Source Code Unverified

Market Context at Time of Hack

Token Categories
Medium of Exchange Payments Layer 2 Metal Ecosystem Binance Ecosystem Binance Listing

What the Attacker Needed to Succeed

Understanding the prerequisites for this type of attack helps auditors identify protocols that are most at risk and helps developers build better defenses.

Technical Knowledge Deep understanding of honeypot and Solidity and EVM internals
Capital Required Seed capital to cover gas and initial position setup
On-Chain Access Ability to interact with smart contracts and deploy a custom exploit contract
Protocol Analysis Identification of the exploitable vulnerability in MetaDAO's contract logic - root cause: token
Execution Speed Precise transaction ordering and timing to exploit the vulnerability within a single atomic block
Obfuscation Plan A strategy to launder and move stolen funds - typically through mixers, cross-chain bridges, or decentralized DEX swaps to resist tracing

What Auditors Should Check

Could this have been caught in audit? Likely — with a thorough Honeypot audit checklist and test coverage

If you're auditing a protocol with similar architecture to MetaDAO, these are the critical security checks that could have prevented this incident (December 2021).

  • Verify all logic paths related to Honeypot are guarded by proper access controls and input validation
  • Review privileged functions (owner, admin, governance) for potential abuse vectors - centralization risks should be documented and bounded with timelocks or multi-sigs

Master these auditing techniques with hands-on labs and real exploit scenarios in the Smart Contract Hacking course.

Free Trial

Sources & References

Learn to Prevent the Next MetaDAO

The MetaDAO hack is one of many attacks that skilled auditors are trained to detect before deployment. Master real exploit patterns and defense techniques with hands-on Web3 security training.

Recreate exploit patterns safely Free Trial