MetaPool Hack

TOTAL LOST $400K
Low Other

Summarize with AI

Affected Chain 2025 Incident surface
Recovered - No recovery reported
All-Time Rank #1067 By amount stolen
Protocol Type Lending Target category

Incident Overview

On June 17, 2025, Meta Pool on the Ethereum network suffered a loss of approximately $400,000 due to a vulnerability in the minting logic of its mpETH pool. The attack also involved MEV frontrunner Yoink, who replicated and executed the exploit immediately after the original attacker.

The exploit originated from Meta Pool’s failure to override or restrict the inherited mint() function from OpenZeppelin’s ERC4626Upgradeable standard. This public, non-payable function allowed users to mint mpETH without actually providing ETH, violating the protocol’s 1:1 backing invariant. The attacker first used a flash loan to drain the liquidUnstakePool of available mpETH, ensuring that the internal swap logic would be bypassed.

They then invoked mint() to mint over 9700 mpETH for free and swapped part of it for ETH, securing a profit of roughly 56.35 ETH (~$142K). An MEV bot named Yoink also front-ran the exploit, taking a share of the proceeds. Meta Pool has since disabled mpETH transfers and committed to ongoing communication and governance updates.

Exploit txs:

https://etherscan.io/tx/0x4f43fc6d…c86ef9

https://etherscan.io/tx/0x57ee419a…d1fa69

Incident Report

Protocol / Project MetaPool
Date of Incident
Attack Technique Other
Classification Other

Protocol Information

Protocol Type Lending
Official Website www.metapool.app/
Protocol Twitter/X @meta_pool?lang=en
Team Anonymous
Source Code Unverified

Market Context at Time of Hack

Token Categories
Ethereum Ecosystem Near Protocol Ecosystem

What the Attacker Needed to Succeed

Understanding the prerequisites for this type of attack helps auditors identify protocols that are most at risk and helps developers build better defenses.

Technical Knowledge Deep understanding of other and Solidity and EVM internals
Capital Required Seed capital to cover gas and initial position setup
On-Chain Access Ability to interact with smart contracts and deploy a custom exploit contract
Protocol Analysis Identification of the exploitable vulnerability in MetaPool's contract logic - root cause: other
Execution Speed Precise transaction ordering and timing to exploit the vulnerability within a single atomic block
Obfuscation Plan A strategy to launder and move stolen funds - typically through mixers, cross-chain bridges, or decentralized DEX swaps to resist tracing

What Auditors Should Check

Could this have been caught in audit? Likely — with a thorough Other audit checklist and test coverage

If you're auditing a protocol with similar architecture to MetaPool, these are the critical security checks that could have prevented this incident (June 2025).

  • Verify all logic paths related to Other are guarded by proper access controls and input validation
  • Review privileged functions (owner, admin, governance) for potential abuse vectors - centralization risks should be documented and bounded with timelocks or multi-sigs

Master these auditing techniques with hands-on labs and real exploit scenarios in the Smart Contract Hacking course.

Free Trial

Sources & References

Learn to Prevent the Next MetaPool

The MetaPool hack is one of many attacks that skilled auditors are trained to detect before deployment. Master real exploit patterns and defense techniques with hands-on Web3 security training.

Recreate exploit patterns safely Free Trial