Securedverse Copycat Hack

TOTAL LOST $131K
Low Rugpull

Summarize with AI

Affected Chain 2023 Incident surface
Recovered - No recovery reported
All-Time Rank #1431 By amount stolen
Protocol Type Exit Scam/Rugpull Target category

Incident Overview

Securedverse copycat project was rugpulled, resulting in a loss of 131,133 $USD due to liquidity removal by a deployer-related EOA.

Securedverse (SVC), a BEP20 token, became a victim of a rugpull executed by a related scammer. Initially, the deployer transferred 500,000,000 $SVC tokens to a distinct address that subsequently added the tokens to the PancakeSwap pool. After a day, this liquidity was removed and the pool was drained entirely by the scammer, allowing them to gain a profit of 131,133 $USD in $BNB.

The stolen funds currently reside in the scammer's address. Please note, Securedverse is a clone project and should not be confused with the original.

Deployer Address:

https://bscscan.com/address/0x525f1fbf…b22ae2

Scammer Address:

https://bscscan.com/address/0x82e7B460…a9CC1f

Token Transfer Transaction:

https://bscscan.com/tx/0xbe9cf5fd…d2f508

Liquidity Removal Transaction Example:

https://bscscan.com/tx/0xae5a2ad1…26b3bb

Incident Report

Protocol / Project Securedverse Copycat
Date of Incident
Attack Technique Rugpull
Classification Token
Primary Source View Post-Mortem

Protocol Information

Protocol Type Exit Scam/Rugpull
Affected Token SVC
Team Anonymous
Source Code Unverified

What the Attacker Needed to Succeed

Understanding the prerequisites for this type of attack helps auditors identify protocols that are most at risk and helps developers build better defenses.

Technical Knowledge Deep understanding of rugpull and Solidity and EVM internals
Capital Required Seed capital to cover gas and initial position setup
On-Chain Access Ability to interact with smart contracts and deploy a custom exploit contract
Protocol Analysis Identification of the exploitable vulnerability in Securedverse Copycat's contract logic - root cause: token
Execution Speed Precise transaction ordering and timing to exploit the vulnerability within a single atomic block
Obfuscation Plan A strategy to launder and move stolen funds - typically through mixers, cross-chain bridges, or decentralized DEX swaps to resist tracing

What Auditors Should Check

Could this have been caught in audit? Hard to catch — private key / OpSec failures are outside smart contract audit scope

If you're auditing a protocol with similar architecture to Securedverse Copycat, these are the critical security checks that could have prevented this incident (June 2023).

  • Verify all logic paths related to Rugpull are guarded by proper access controls and input validation
  • Review privileged functions (owner, admin, governance) for potential abuse vectors - centralization risks should be documented and bounded with timelocks or multi-sigs

Master these auditing techniques with hands-on labs and real exploit scenarios in the Smart Contract Hacking course.

Free Trial

Sources & References

Learn to Prevent the Next Securedverse Copycat

The Securedverse Copycat hack is one of many attacks that skilled auditors are trained to detect before deployment. Master real exploit patterns and defense techniques with hands-on Web3 security training.

Recreate exploit patterns safely Free Trial