House of paper Hack
Incident Overview
The contract owner could disable the transfer function, which restricted users in selling their tokens.
The contract deployer added initial liquidity at:
https://etherscan.io/tx/0xe07ecf72…7b04ce
The contract deployer used hidden minting functionality under the stakingTransfer() function to generate new tokens onto his wallet at:
https://etherscan.io/tx/0x57fc84ab…624fcb
The minted tokens were sold by the contract deployer at:
https://etherscan.io/tx/0x4ef7dcf6…70a5b7
Incident Report
Protocol Information
What the Attacker Needed to Succeed
Understanding the prerequisites for this type of attack helps auditors identify protocols that are most at risk and helps developers build better defenses.
What Auditors Should Check
If you're auditing a protocol with similar architecture to House of paper, these are the critical security checks that could have prevented this incident (November 2020).
- Verify all logic paths related to Honeypot are guarded by proper access controls and input validation
- Review privileged functions (owner, admin, governance) for potential abuse vectors - centralization risks should be documented and bounded with timelocks or multi-sigs
Master these auditing techniques with hands-on labs and real exploit scenarios in the Smart Contract Hacking course.
Free TrialSources & References
-
01
Source 1 http://houseofpaper.finance/
Learn to Prevent the Next House of paper
The House of paper hack is one of many attacks that skilled auditors are trained to detect before deployment. Master real exploit patterns and defense techniques with hands-on Web3 security training.