JohnLennonC0IN Hack

TOTAL LOST $11K
Low Rugpull

Summarize with AI

Affected Chain 2024 Incident surface
Recovered - No recovery reported
All-Time Rank #1935 By amount stolen
Protocol Type Exit Scam/Rugpull Target category

Incident Overview

BEATLES token was rugpulled by scammer, total loss worth more 11,336 USD from PancakeSwap pool.

BEATLES is a BEP20 token trading on PancakeSwap.When the token was created, the token creator sent tokens to three addresses, then a large number of tokens were sold,removed from the LP pool, frome these addresses.The scammers used disperse.app to send funds to multiple addresses, then bought and sold tokens from these addresses , affecting the token price. The deployer did not buy or sell tokens, but both the deployer and scammers received funds from the same address, indicating a scam under the guise of an honest project. Stolen funds were transferred to another EOA and then distributed between multiple addresses.

Deployer Address:

https://bscscan.com/address/0xBAb318f9…b11B9F

Scammer's Addresses:

https://bscscan.com/address/0x861091bE…aa7c4C

https://bscscan.com/address/0x4639026A…833EC8

https://bscscan.com/address/0xefbf0b01…961bcc

Liquidity Add Transaction:

https://bscscan.com/tx/0x22642d3d…1ceb35

Liquidity Removal Transactions:

https://bscscan.com/tx/0xee3bdbc1…8c357a

https://bscscan.com/tx/0x54348d4e…bef544

Transactions where the scammer got the tokens:

https://bscscan.com/tx/0x83f76891…64f472

https://bscscan.com/tx/0x6307aca8…a95b7c

https://bscscan.com/tx/0x2b3bb025…91d6e6

Incident Report

Protocol / Project JohnLennonC0IN
Date of Incident
Attack Technique Rugpull
Classification Token
Primary Source View Post-Mortem

Protocol Information

Protocol Type Exit Scam/Rugpull
Affected Token BEATLES
Team Anonymous
Source Code Verified On-Chain

What the Attacker Needed to Succeed

Understanding the prerequisites for this type of attack helps auditors identify protocols that are most at risk and helps developers build better defenses.

Technical Knowledge Deep understanding of rugpull and Solidity and EVM internals
Capital Required Seed capital to cover gas and initial position setup
On-Chain Access Ability to interact with smart contracts and deploy a custom exploit contract
Protocol Analysis Identification of the exploitable vulnerability in JohnLennonC0IN's contract logic - root cause: token
Execution Speed Precise transaction ordering and timing to exploit the vulnerability within a single atomic block
Obfuscation Plan A strategy to launder and move stolen funds - typically through mixers, cross-chain bridges, or decentralized DEX swaps to resist tracing

What Auditors Should Check

Could this have been caught in audit? Hard to catch — private key / OpSec failures are outside smart contract audit scope

If you're auditing a protocol with similar architecture to JohnLennonC0IN, these are the critical security checks that could have prevented this incident (January 2024).

  • Verify all logic paths related to Rugpull are guarded by proper access controls and input validation
  • Review privileged functions (owner, admin, governance) for potential abuse vectors - centralization risks should be documented and bounded with timelocks or multi-sigs

Master these auditing techniques with hands-on labs and real exploit scenarios in the Smart Contract Hacking course.

Free Trial

Sources & References

Learn to Prevent the Next JohnLennonC0IN

The JohnLennonC0IN hack is one of many attacks that skilled auditors are trained to detect before deployment. Master real exploit patterns and defense techniques with hands-on Web3 security training.

Recreate exploit patterns safely Free Trial