MIKE and SID Tokens Hack

TOTAL LOST $170K
Low Rugpull

Summarize with AI

Affected Chain 2023 Incident surface
Recovered - No recovery reported
All-Time Rank #1356 By amount stolen
Protocol Type Exit Scam/Rugpull Target category

Incident Overview

MIKE and SID tokens suffered from a rugpull, performed by the same EOA, causing a loss of 169,652 $USD.

Two ERC20 tokens, MIKE and SID, experienced a rugpull from an EOA address connected with both token deployers. The perpetrator utilized a backdoor function to mint and swap a large amount of tokens. The MIKE/WETH pool was drained for 50.44 $ETH, worth around 98,095 $USD, and the SID/WETH pool was drained for 37.38 $ETH, worth approximately 71,557 $USD at the time of the incident.

All the stolen funds were transferred to two EOA addresses.

Scammer Address:

https://etherscan.io/address/0xF7E0d995…28F79D

Liquidity Drain Transactions:

https://etherscan.io/tx/0xc70c66d1…977e63

https://etherscan.io/tx/0x4047eb8b…aabb30

Funds Transfer Transactions:

https://etherscan.io/tx/0xbdd481c5…7593ae

https://etherscan.io/tx/0x3889e410…329c1e

Incident Report

Protocol / Project MIKE and SID Tokens
Date of Incident
Attack Technique Rugpull
Classification Token
Primary Source View Post-Mortem

Protocol Information

Protocol Type Exit Scam/Rugpull
Affected Token MIKE
Team Anonymous
Source Code Verified On-Chain

What the Attacker Needed to Succeed

Understanding the prerequisites for this type of attack helps auditors identify protocols that are most at risk and helps developers build better defenses.

Technical Knowledge Deep understanding of rugpull and Solidity and EVM internals
Capital Required Seed capital to cover gas and initial position setup
On-Chain Access Ability to interact with smart contracts and deploy a custom exploit contract
Protocol Analysis Identification of the exploitable vulnerability in MIKE and SID Tokens's contract logic - root cause: token
Execution Speed Precise transaction ordering and timing to exploit the vulnerability within a single atomic block
Obfuscation Plan A strategy to launder and move stolen funds - typically through mixers, cross-chain bridges, or decentralized DEX swaps to resist tracing

What Auditors Should Check

Could this have been caught in audit? Hard to catch — private key / OpSec failures are outside smart contract audit scope

If you're auditing a protocol with similar architecture to MIKE and SID Tokens, these are the critical security checks that could have prevented this incident (July 2023).

  • Verify all logic paths related to Rugpull are guarded by proper access controls and input validation
  • Review privileged functions (owner, admin, governance) for potential abuse vectors - centralization risks should be documented and bounded with timelocks or multi-sigs

Master these auditing techniques with hands-on labs and real exploit scenarios in the Smart Contract Hacking course.

Free Trial

Sources & References

Learn to Prevent the Next MIKE and SID Tokens

The MIKE and SID Tokens hack is one of many attacks that skilled auditors are trained to detect before deployment. Master real exploit patterns and defense techniques with hands-on Web3 security training.

Recreate exploit patterns safely Free Trial