Nemo Finance Hack

TOTAL LOST $32K
Low Honeypot ethereum

Summarize with AI

Affected Chain ethereum Incident surface
Recovered - No recovery reported
All-Time Rank #1816 By amount stolen
Auditors 1 Prior security audit

Incident Overview

The contract owner could disable the transfer function, which restricted users in selling their tokens.

The contract deployer added initial liquidity at:

https://etherscan.io/tx/0xda2135fc…7fc09a

The contract deployer used hidden minting functionality under the addWork() function to generate new tokens onto his wallet at:

https://etherscan.io/tx/0xfb014977…9bacba

The minted tokens were sold by the contract deployer:

https://etherscan.io/tx/0x74f351d3…690dd0

https://etherscan.io/tx/0x579aacf1…e533ea

https://etherscan.io/tx/0x230f8d19…e12178

https://etherscan.io/tx/0x95fb7e01…5df5bc

The stolen funds were transferred to the external wallet:

https://etherscan.io/tx/0x6989211c…862122

Incident Report

Protocol / Project Nemo Finance
Date of Incident
Affected Chain(s) ethereum
Attack Technique Honeypot
Classification Token
Primary Source View Post-Mortem

Protocol Information

Protocol Type Liquid Restaking
Affected Token NEMO
Official Website nemo.finance/
Protocol Twitter/X @neemofinance

What the Attacker Needed to Succeed

Understanding the prerequisites for this type of attack helps auditors identify protocols that are most at risk and helps developers build better defenses.

Technical Knowledge Deep understanding of honeypot and Solidity and EVM internals
Capital Required Seed capital to cover gas and initial position setup
On-Chain Access Ability to interact with ethereum smart contracts and deploy a custom exploit contract
Protocol Analysis Identification of the exploitable vulnerability in Nemo Finance's contract logic - root cause: token
Execution Speed Precise transaction ordering and timing to exploit the vulnerability within a single atomic block
Obfuscation Plan A strategy to launder and move stolen funds - typically through mixers, cross-chain bridges, or decentralized DEX swaps to resist tracing

What Auditors Should Check

Could this have been caught in audit? Likely — with a thorough Honeypot audit checklist and test coverage
Audited by Audit Report 1 — still lost $32K. Prior audits don't guarantee safety, especially after post-audit code changes.

If you're auditing a protocol with similar architecture to Nemo Finance, these are the critical security checks that could have prevented this incident (October 2020).

  • Verify all logic paths related to Honeypot are guarded by proper access controls and input validation
  • Review privileged functions (owner, admin, governance) for potential abuse vectors - centralization risks should be documented and bounded with timelocks or multi-sigs

Master these auditing techniques with hands-on labs and real exploit scenarios in the Smart Contract Hacking course.

Free Trial

Security Audit History

Sources & References

Learn to Prevent the Next Nemo Finance

The Nemo Finance hack is one of many attacks that skilled auditors are trained to detect before deployment. Master real exploit patterns and defense techniques with hands-on Web3 security training.

Recreate exploit patterns safely Free Trial