Phishing Hack

TOTAL LOST $91.0M
High #83 All-Time Phishing

Summarize with AI

Affected Chain 2025 Incident surface
Recovered - No recovery reported
All-Time Rank #83 By amount stolen
Protocol Type Exploit/Phishing Target category

Incident Overview

On August 19, 2025, a victim lost 783 BTC ($91 million) in a social engineering scam where threat actors impersonated exchange and hardware wallet customer support representatives. The theft occurred exactly one year after the $243 million Genesis Creditor theft, with the stolen funds beginning to be laundered through privacy-focused services including Wasabi wallet.

The attack was executed through sophisticated social engineering tactics where the perpetrators impersonated legitimate customer support personnel from both cryptocurrency exchanges and hardware wallet companies. The victim was manipulated into providing access credentials or performing actions that compromised their Bitcoin holdings, resulting in the unauthorized transfer of 783 BTC valued at approximately $91 million. Following the theft, the threat actors immediately began implementing money laundering techniques, including "peeling" transactions to break up the large sum into smaller amounts and making deposits to Wasabi wallet, a privacy-focused Bitcoin mixing service designed to obscure transaction trails.

The timing of this theft is particularly notable as it occurred exactly one year after the massive $243 million Genesis Creditor theft, suggesting possible coordination or symbolic significance to the attackers.

Transaction Hash:

da598f2a941ee3c249a3c11e5e171e186a08900012f6aad26e6d11b8e8816457

Exploiter Address:

bc1qyxyk4qgyrkx4rjwsuevug04wahdk6uf95mqlej

Incident Report

Protocol / Project Phishing
Date of Incident
Attack Technique Phishing
Classification Other

Protocol Information

Protocol Type Exploit/Phishing
Team Anonymous
Source Code Unverified

What the Attacker Needed to Succeed

Understanding the prerequisites for this type of attack helps auditors identify protocols that are most at risk and helps developers build better defenses.

Technical Knowledge Deep understanding of phishing and Solidity and EVM internals
Capital Required Seed capital to cover gas and initial position setup
On-Chain Access Ability to interact with smart contracts and deploy a custom exploit contract
Protocol Analysis Identification of the exploitable vulnerability in Phishing's contract logic - root cause: other
Execution Speed Precise transaction ordering and timing to exploit the vulnerability within a single atomic block
Obfuscation Plan A strategy to launder and move stolen funds - typically through mixers, cross-chain bridges, or decentralized DEX swaps to resist tracing

What Auditors Should Check

Could this have been caught in audit? Likely — with a thorough Phishing audit checklist and test coverage

If you're auditing a protocol with similar architecture to Phishing, these are the critical security checks that could have prevented this incident (August 2025).

  • Verify all logic paths related to Phishing are guarded by proper access controls and input validation - see the Phishing Attacks attack class for patterns
  • Review privileged functions (owner, admin, governance) for potential abuse vectors - centralization risks should be documented and bounded with timelocks or multi-sigs

Master these auditing techniques with hands-on labs and real exploit scenarios in the Smart Contract Hacking course.

Free Trial

Related Attack Classes

The technique used in this hack maps to these vulnerability classes in our security curriculum:

See all Phishing Attacks examples →

Sources & References

Learn to Prevent the Next Phishing

The Phishing hack is one of many attacks that skilled auditors are trained to detect before deployment. Master real exploit patterns and defense techniques with hands-on Web3 security training.

Recreate exploit patterns safely Free Trial