PlusToken Hack

TOTAL LOST $2.9B
Critical #6 All-Time Rugpull

Summarize with AI

Affected Chain 2019 Incident surface
Recovered - No recovery reported
All-Time Rank #6 By amount stolen
Protocol Type Exit Scam/Rugpull Target category

Incident Overview

The perpetrators of one of the largest digital currency frauds have been sentenced to up to 11 years in prison. In addition, the PlusToken operators were penalized up to $900,000 by a Chinese court for their participation in the $2.25 billion Ponzi scam.

Chen Bo established PlusToken in early 2018, posing as a South Korean wallet and exchange. It enticed investors by promising speedy and guaranteed returns. In the two years afterwards, Bo has recruited numerous others and spread the fraud to other Southeast Asian nations such as China, Cambodia, Malaysia, Vanuatu, and Vietnam.

PlusToken operators had devised a pyramid scheme that managed to lure over 2.6 million investors, authorities said. The scam was organized into at least 3,200 investor levels, with more referrals and bigger investments bumping an investor up the chain. The operators also lied to investors that they were making money through digital currency investing, according to investors.

Incident Report

Protocol / Project PlusToken
Date of Incident
Attack Technique Rugpull
Classification CeFi

Protocol Information

Protocol Type Exit Scam/Rugpull
Protocol Twitter/X @PoSToken
Team Anonymous
Source Code Unverified

Market Context at Time of Hack

Token Categories
Platform DeFi Smart Contracts

What the Attacker Needed to Succeed

Understanding the prerequisites for this type of attack helps auditors identify protocols that are most at risk and helps developers build better defenses.

Technical Knowledge Deep understanding of rugpull and Solidity and EVM internals
Capital Required Seed capital to cover gas and initial position setup
On-Chain Access Ability to interact with smart contracts and deploy a custom exploit contract
Protocol Analysis Identification of the exploitable vulnerability in PlusToken's contract logic - root cause: cefi
Execution Speed Precise transaction ordering and timing to exploit the vulnerability within a single atomic block
Obfuscation Plan A strategy to launder and move stolen funds - typically through mixers, cross-chain bridges, or decentralized DEX swaps to resist tracing

What Auditors Should Check

Could this have been caught in audit? Hard to catch — private key / OpSec failures are outside smart contract audit scope

If you're auditing a protocol with similar architecture to PlusToken, these are the critical security checks that could have prevented this incident (December 2019).

  • Verify all logic paths related to Rugpull are guarded by proper access controls and input validation
  • Review privileged functions (owner, admin, governance) for potential abuse vectors - centralization risks should be documented and bounded with timelocks or multi-sigs

Master these auditing techniques with hands-on labs and real exploit scenarios in the Smart Contract Hacking course.

Free Trial

Sources & References

Learn to Prevent the Next PlusToken

The PlusToken hack is one of many attacks that skilled auditors are trained to detect before deployment. Master real exploit patterns and defense techniques with hands-on Web3 security training.

Recreate exploit patterns safely Free Trial