Walletreum Hack

TOTAL LOST $138K
Low Rugpull ethereum

Summarize with AI

Affected Chain ethereum Incident surface
Recovered - No recovery reported
All-Time Rank #1417 By amount stolen
Protocol Type Exit Scam/Rugpull Target category

Incident Overview

Walletreum's project deployer abused the mint() function and extracted $138k from the project and its investors.

Walletreum was supposed to be an innovative crypto asset management tool focussing on lending and borrowing and real-world application. Unfortunately, the smart contract had malicious functions embedded that allowed the project deployer to mint as many $WALT token as desired.

In fact, the contract deployer used the mint() function to generate 500 billion tokens onto an external wallet:

https://etherscan.io/tx/0xc0f3b057…4710e5

The EOA wallet exchanged the minted tokens for 138,439 $USDT.

https://bloxy.info/txs/calls_from/0x665f3841…29d358?signature_id=1102183&smart_contract_address_bin=0x7a250d56…f2488d

The $USDT 138,439 were exchanged for $ETH:

https://etherscan.io/tx/0xc47c26a8…6e7f15

Then the attacker decided to swap all of the $ETH in his wallet for 156,120 USDT:

https://etherscan.io/tx/0xe20d10e7…fce7ac

Then funds were then transferred to Binance in multiple transactions as can be seen in the example transactions:

https://etherscan.io/tx/0xf9cf08f5…0f221f

https://etherscan.io/tx/0xcce3eacb…7217f9

Scanner

Project Deployer:

https://etherscan.io/address/0xa5e552e3…aee775

EOA Scammer Wallet:

https://etherscan.io/address/0x665f3841…29d358

Incident Report

Protocol / Project Walletreum
Date of Incident
Affected Chain(s) ethereum
Attack Technique Rugpull
Classification Borrowing and Lending
Primary Source View Post-Mortem

Protocol Information

Protocol Type Exit Scam/Rugpull
Affected Token WALT
Official Website walletreum.com/
Protocol Twitter/X @walletreum
Team Anonymous
Source Code Unverified

Market Context at Time of Hack

What the Attacker Needed to Succeed

Understanding the prerequisites for this type of attack helps auditors identify protocols that are most at risk and helps developers build better defenses.

Technical Knowledge Deep understanding of rugpull and Solidity and EVM internals
Capital Required Seed capital to cover gas and initial position setup
On-Chain Access Ability to interact with ethereum smart contracts and deploy a custom exploit contract
Protocol Analysis Identification of the exploitable vulnerability in Walletreum's contract logic - root cause: borrowing and lending
Execution Speed Precise transaction ordering and timing to exploit the vulnerability within a single atomic block
Obfuscation Plan A strategy to launder and move stolen funds - typically through mixers, cross-chain bridges, or decentralized DEX swaps to resist tracing

What Auditors Should Check

Could this have been caught in audit? Hard to catch — private key / OpSec failures are outside smart contract audit scope

If you're auditing a protocol with similar architecture to Walletreum, these are the critical security checks that could have prevented this incident (November 2020).

  • Verify all logic paths related to Rugpull are guarded by proper access controls and input validation
  • Review privileged functions (owner, admin, governance) for potential abuse vectors - centralization risks should be documented and bounded with timelocks or multi-sigs

Master these auditing techniques with hands-on labs and real exploit scenarios in the Smart Contract Hacking course.

Free Trial

Sources & References

Learn to Prevent the Next Walletreum

The Walletreum hack is one of many attacks that skilled auditors are trained to detect before deployment. Master real exploit patterns and defense techniques with hands-on Web3 security training.

Recreate exploit patterns safely Free Trial