Web3 Security Trends

Updated 15 Sep 2026About these numbers
More filters
Reset
01 Sep 2025–31 Aug 2026compared with 01 Sep 2024–31 Aug 2025
Reported loss$2.72B ↓ 71% vs prior period 347/354 loss amounts reported
Reported attacks354 ↑ 55% vs prior period
Median incident loss$679K ↑ 3% vs prior period

Attacks and losses over time

Scroll to see every period

View chart as a table
PeriodReported lossAttacksKnown amounts
Sep 2025$176.5M2222 of 22
Oct 2025$51.6M1515 of 15
Nov 2025$288.4M1818 of 18
Dec 2025$79.5M2020 of 20
Jan 2026$405.4M3030 of 30
Feb 2026$36.8M1414 of 14
Mar 2026$77.8M3028 of 30
Apr 2026$951.7M3938 of 39
May 2026$112.5M5050 of 50
Jun 2026$93.9M4141 of 41
Jul 2026$299.4M4242 of 42
Aug 2026$145.2M3329 of 33

What changed

  1. Compared with the previous period, reported loss fell by $6.50B while incident count rose by 125.

    See incidents
  2. Drift Trade drove 11% of known reported loss in this period.

    Open incidentSource
  3. Incorrect Share Accounting was the most frequently recorded attack method, appearing in 14 incidents.

    Open incidentSource

Attack methods

  1. Incorrect Share Accounting14
  2. Access Control13
  3. Spot Price Manipulation13
  4. Improper Access Control11
  5. Phishing7
  6. Forged Proof6
  7. Oracle Issue6
  8. Private Key Compromised6
  1. Phishing$372.9M
  2. Access Control$352.0M
  3. Compromised Admin + Fake Token Price Manipulation / Proxy Upgrade Hijack$295.0M
  4. Access Control / Cross-Chain Message Spoofing$293.0M
  5. Other / Weak Key Generation$130.0M
  6. Composable Stable Pools Exploit / Access Control / Rounding Error$128.0M
  7. Oracle Issue / Donation Attack$75.0M
  8. Delegatecall Exploit / Access Control / Delegatecall Hijack$48.0M

Affected sectors

200 uncategorized incidents excluded

  1. DeFi applications115
  2. Other21
  3. Bridges12
  4. Centralized services4
  5. Wallets2
  1. DeFi applications$788.7M
  2. Other$167.5M
  3. Bridges$60.1M
  4. Centralized services$43.5M
  5. Wallets$8.6M

Affected chains

68 unnamed-chain incidents excluded. Multi-chain counts and losses overlap.

  1. Ethereum102
  2. BNB Chain61
  3. Base35
  4. Arbitrum33
  5. Solana20
  6. Polygon14
  7. Bitcoin7
  8. Sui6
  9. Avalanche6
  10. Optimism4
  1. Ethereum$849.4M
  2. Arbitrum$555.7M
  3. Solana$474.1M
  4. Base$204.8M
  5. Bitcoin$176.5M
  6. Polygon$134.2M
  7. Optimism$130.2M
  8. Sonic$128.1M
  9. BNB Chain$96.4M
  10. Cronos$75.0M

Incidents behind this view

15 matching records · 2025-10 selected · Clear selection

Full incident database
DateIncident and attack methodChainReported lossEvidence
30 Oct 2025GardenSolver SSH and Wallet Key CompromiseArbitrum, Base, Ethereum, Solana$11.4MSource
27 Oct 2025402bridgePrivate Key Compromised (Stored Publicly) / Access Control / Key Stored PubliclyBase$18KSource
21 Oct 2025DoodiPalsPrivate Key CompromisedSolana$171K
20 Oct 2025Sharwa.FinancePrice Manipulation Attack / Other / Swap Logic FlawArbitrum$147KSource
19 Oct 2025Astra NovaPrivate Key CompromisedEthereum$9.1M
15 Oct 2025Typus FinanceOracle IssueNot recorded$3.4MSource
15 Oct 2025Typus PerpMissing Oracle AuthorizationSui$3.3MSource
10 Oct 2025Hyperliquid User Private Key CompromiseAccess ControlNot recorded$21.0MSource
10 Oct 2025OracleBNBRugpullNot recorded$80KSource
09 Oct 2025Astera.fiOracle Price Feed Manipulation / Flash Loan Attack / Incorrect Share AccountingLinea$822KSource
07 Oct 2025TokenHolderImproper Access ControlBNB Chain$26K
07 Oct 2025SquidOtherNot recorded$90KSource
07 Oct 2025VeloraDEXOtherNot recorded$20KSource
04 Oct 2025Abracadabra SpellSequential State Manipulation Exploit / Other / Improper Access ControlEthereum$1.7MSource
03 Oct 2025EIP-7702 Delegation Contract ExploitOtherNot recorded$336KSource

About these numbers

Updated 15 Sep 2026, 22:42 UTC

Incident selection

This dashboard covers reported incidents, not every attack or the relative safety of a chain. Each verified canonical incident is counted once. Unverified, rejected, merged duplicate, pending-review, and future-dated records are excluded. Late reports and corrections can change recent periods.

Loss and outliers

Reported loss sums known positive USD amounts. Missing amounts stay unknown, not zero. Median incident loss uses only incidents with a known amount. “Exclude the largest incident” removes the largest known-loss event from both the selected and comparison periods.

Missing classifications

Sector and chain labels come from the incident record. Uncategorized incidents are excluded from sector charts; incidents without a named chain are excluded from chain charts. A multi-chain incident appears under each named chain, so those counts overlap.

Limitations

Reliable malicious-actor attribution is not consistently available, so this page does not rank actor groups. Timing alone cannot show that AI caused an attack, so there is no AI-involvement metric. Confirmed returned funds are too sparsely documented for a recovery trend: 2 of 354 incidents in this view have comparable reviewed accounting, totaling $1.9M.

Cite this view

Smart Contract Hacking (SCH), “Web3 Security Trends: 2025-09-01 to 2026-08-31,” method 2026-09-15.1, view 4877e750d4f5, accessed 15 September 2026. https://smartcontractshacking.com/tools/web3-security-trends?bucket=2025-10&page=1

Live view. Figures may change as incident records are updated.