How much was lost in the Mining Capital Coin hack?

The Mining Capital Coin hack resulted in $62.0M in losses on May 06, 2022.

What attack technique was used in the Mining Capital Coin exploit?

The Mining Capital Coin exploit utilized Rugpull. Understanding this attack vector is critical for smart contract auditors and developers building secure DeFi protocols.

How can developers prevent similar smart contract attacks?

Preventing smart contract hacks requires a combination of secure coding practices, thorough security audits, and understanding common attack vectors like reentrancy, oracle manipulation, and access control flaws. Smart Contract Hacking (SCH) provides hands-on training to help developers and auditors identify and prevent vulnerabilities before deployment.

Mining Capital Coin Hack

TOTAL LOST $62.0M

High #106 All-Time May 06, 2022 Rugpull

Affected Chain 2022 Incident surface

Recovered - No recovery reported

All-Time Rank #106 By amount stolen

Protocol Type Exit Scam/Rugpull Target category

Incident Overview

Quick Summary

The founder of Mining Capital Coin committed investment fraud and mislead investors about guaranteed returns from mining coins for their funds.

Details of the Exploit

Founder and CEO of Mining Capital Coin Luiz Capuci Jr. did mislead investors about MCC's plan about mining coins and using MCC Trading Bots to generate profits but instead redirected collected funds to an independent wallet under his control. He was charged with orchestrating a 62,000,000 $USD investment fraud by U.S. Department of Justice.

0x81d3ec77438b4e99aa99ba25b1dbc3fea317fe3b0x81d3ec77438b4e99aa99ba25b1dbc3fea317fe3b

Incident Report

Protocol / Project Mining Capital Coin

Date of Incident May 06, 2022

Attack Technique Rugpull

Classification Other

Primary Source View Post-Mortem

Protocol Information

Protocol Type Exit Scam/Rugpull

Team Anonymous

Source Code Unverified

What the Attacker Needed to Succeed

Understanding the prerequisites for this type of attack helps auditors identify protocols that are most at risk and helps developers build better defenses.

Technical Knowledge Deep understanding of rugpull and Solidity and EVM internals

Capital Required Seed capital to cover gas and initial position setup

On-Chain Access Ability to interact with smart contracts and deploy a custom exploit contract

Protocol Analysis Identification of the exploitable vulnerability in Mining Capital Coin's contract logic - root cause: other

Execution Speed Precise transaction ordering and timing to exploit the vulnerability within a single atomic block

Obfuscation Plan A strategy to launder and move stolen funds - typically through mixers, cross-chain bridges, or decentralized DEX swaps to resist tracing

What Auditors Should Check

Could this have been caught in audit? Hard to catch — private key / OpSec failures are outside smart contract audit scope

If you're auditing a protocol with similar architecture to Mining Capital Coin, these are the critical security checks that could have prevented this incident (May 2022).

Verify all logic paths related to Rugpull are guarded by proper access controls and input validation
Review privileged functions (owner, admin, governance) for potential abuse vectors - centralization risks should be documented and bounded with timelocks or multi-sigs

Master these auditing techniques with hands-on labs and real exploit scenarios in the Smart Contract Hacking course.

Free Trial

Sources & References

01
Source 1 https://archive.is/loBef

Threat Assessment

Severity Level

HIGH

Attack Vector Rugpull
Root Cause Other
Year 2022

Learn to Prevent the Next Mining Capital Coin

The Mining Capital Coin hack is one of many attacks that skilled auditors are trained to detect before deployment. Master real exploit patterns and defense techniques with hands-on Web3 security training.

Start Free Trial Browse Attack Library