🥇
Terra Classic
$40.00B
Most Expensive Crypto Hacks Leaderboard
The biggest Web3 and DeFi exploits ranked by amount lost. Track high-impact incidents, study attack patterns, and learn how security failures scale into multi-million dollar losses.
-
$91B+
Total Value Lost
-
3595
Incidents Tracked
-
141
Chains Affected
-
65
$100M+ Incidents
Top 10 Biggest Hacks
Where the Largest Losses Concentrate
Top Chains by Losses
Top Techniques by Losses
Full Leaderboard
Showing 1601-1650 of 3595 ranked incidents
| Rank | Project | Amount Lost | Date | Chain | Technique | Attack Guide | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1601 | Philcoin | $103K | - | Rugpull | — | View → | |
| 1602 | Dor | $103K | - | Rugpull | — | View → | |
| 1603 | Mars Meta Space | $102K | - | Access Control | Access Control Attacks | View → | |
| 1604 | Huma Finance V2 | $101K | polygon | Improper Access Control | Access Control Attacks | — | |
| 1605 | Yearn Machine Learning | $100K | ethereum | Rugpull | — | View → | |
| 1606 | KUKUCoin | $100K | - | Rugpull | — | View → | |
| 1607 | Zerion Wallet | $100K | - | Hot Wallet Compromise via Social Engineering / Phishing | Phishing Attacks | View → | |
| 1608 | PGNLZ token | $100K | bsc | Flash Loan Attack / Incorrect Share Accounting | Flash Loan Attacks | View → | |
| 1609 | DRLVaultV3 | $100K | ethereum | Spot Price Manipulation | Oracle Manipulation & Price Manipulation | — | |
| 1610 | QuantMaster | $100K | ethereum | Backdoor Contract | — | — | |
| 1611 | BYC Token | $100K | binance | Incorrect Fee Accounting | — | — | |
| 1612 | OPSEC | $100K | ethereum | Private Key Compromised | Access Control Attacks | — | |
| 1613 | LayerSwap | $100K | ethereum | DNS Hijack | — | — | |
| 1614 | Baby Doge Coin | $100K | - | Flash Loan Attack | Flash Loan Attacks | View → | |
| 1615 | POOPEPE token | $100K | - | Rugpull | — | View → | |
| 1616 | XCAD | $100K | - | Rugpull | — | View → | |
| 1617 | UNMS | $100K | - | Flash Loan Attack | Flash Loan Attacks | View → | |
| 1618 | SUI Token | $100K | - | Rugpull | — | View → | |
| 1619 | Ranger | $100K | - | Rugpull | — | View → | |
| 1620 | Formation.Fi | $100K | - | Other | — | View → | |
| 1621 | Coinbase | $100K | - | Access Control | Access Control Attacks | View → | |
| 1622 | Vertcoin | $100K | vertcoin | Risk Parameter Abuse | — | — | |
| 1623 | DMD | $99K | - | Rugpull | — | View → | |
| 1624 | Frontfanz | $98K | - | Rugpull | — | View → | |
| 1625 | ONTR | $98K | ethereum | Ownership Takeover | Access Control Attacks | — | |
| 1626 | FlashTrade | $98K | solana | Missing Input Validation | — | View → | |
| 1627 | Aphrodite Protocol | $97K | ethereum | Rugpull | — | View → | |
| 1628 | IEXCBP | $97K | bsc | Spot Price Manipulation | Oracle Manipulation & Price Manipulation | — | |
| 1629 | PRXVT | $97K | base | Sybil Attack with CREATE2 Addresses / Staking Logic Flaw | — | View → | |
| 1630 | Citadel Finance | $97K | arbitrum | Flash Loan Attack / Improper Access Control | Access Control Attacks | View → | |
| 1631 | GN | $96K | - | Rugpull | — | — | |
| 1632 | OBB | $96K | - | Rugpull | — | View → | |
| 1633 | Alkimiya | $96K | ethereum | Arithmetic Error | — | — | |
| 1634 | Safe Dollar | $95K | polygon | Other | — | View → | |
| 1635 | Pine Protocol | $95K | ethereum | Swap Logic Flaw | — | — | |
| 1636 | Pepe Coin | $95K | - | Rugpull | — | View → | |
| 1637 | CityDAO | $95K | ethereum | Access Control / Phishing | Access Control Attacks | View → | |
| 1638 | Citizen Finance | $94K | bsc, polygon | Access Control / Private Key Compromised | Access Control Attacks | View → | |
| 1639 | OkayLetsGo | $94K | - | Rugpull | — | View → | |
| 1640 | APE | $94K | - | Rugpull | — | — | |
| 1641 | Hegic(old contract) | $94K | ethereum | Unlimited repeated withdrawal exploit / Withdrawal Logic Flaw | — | View → | |
| 1642 | Marvel Metauniverse | $94K | - | Rugpull | — | View → | |
| 1643 | Sloth Climb | $94K | - | Rugpull | — | View → | |
| 1644 | Nifity | $93K | ethereum | Rugpull | — | View → | |
| 1645 | warp.green | $93K | chia, ethereum | Bridge Logic Flaw | — | View → | |
| 1646 | Ramses | $93K | arbitrum | Other / Reward Logic Flaw | — | View → | |
| 1647 | TRT | $93K | - | Rugpull | — | View → | |
| 1648 | MCN Labs | $93K | - | Other | — | View → | |
| 1649 | FastSwap | $93K | - | Other | — | View → | |
| 1650 | Dividend Token | $92K | ethereum | Rugpull | — | View → |
Data sourced from DefiLlama & SunWeb3Sec/DeFiHackLabs . Thank you for keeping Web3 security data open.
Understanding the Pattern Behind Billion-Dollar Losses
The most expensive crypto hacks are not random. They cluster around repeating vulnerability patterns: access-control failures, flash-loan manipulation, oracle abuse, and unsafe external calls. Studying large-loss incidents helps security researchers prioritize high-impact threat models first.
For deeper context, explore the full Web3 Hacks Dashboard and our Smart Contract Attack Library for hands-on exploit and mitigation breakdowns.
Frequently Asked Questions
How is this leaderboard ranked?
Incidents are ranked by parsed USD amount lost in descending order. Records without parseable loss values are excluded from this ranking.
Does this include every attack type?
It includes all incidents with known loss values in the database. Use the full dashboard for broader filtering and lower-severity incidents.
How can I learn to prevent these exploits?
Study attack-class pages first, then practice in guided exercises inside the Smart Contract Hacking course.
Learn to Prevent High-Impact Smart Contract Hacks
$91B+ lost to preventable vulnerabilities. Master real exploit patterns and defense techniques with hands-on Web3 security training.
Start your free security training
Get 25 free lessons and 4 guided exploit exercises.
Onboarding details by email within 2–3 business days.