Ploutoz Finance Hack

TOTAL LOST $372K
Low Flash Loan Attack

Summarize with AI

Affected Chain 2021 Incident surface
Recovered - No recovery reported
All-Time Rank #1086 By amount stolen
Auditors 3 Prior security audits

Incident Overview

The attacker's address:

https://bscscan.com/address/0x2f618493…6b315e

The transaction behind the attack:

https://bscscan.com/tx/0x7fe46c27…099457

The attacker:

- flash loaded 1,000,400 BUSD from PancakeSwap BNB/BUSD pair

- swapped 1,000,00 BUSD for 570,234 DOP tokens to push the price up

- swapped 400 BUSD for 8,841 DOP

- borrowed 86,921 BUSD, 85 CAKE, 18,000 DLOOY, 18 ETH, 1.69 BTCB, 89,000 USDT on Ploutoz Finance using pumped DOP as collateral

- reversed swap and repaid the flash loan.

The hack is made possible due to the price oracle manipulation of DOP.

Stolen funds were deposited into Tornado Cash mixer at:

https://bscscan.com/tx/0x9f7d1936…81ec3d

https://bscscan.com/tx/0x3f7ca0eb…0e7abd

https://bscscan.com/tx/0x93b1f71d…bdcb04

https://bscscan.com/tx/0xfeeb8639…1bd118

https://bscscan.com/tx/0x0cd229b7…50effd

https://bscscan.com/tx/0x12462e50…32330d

https://bscscan.com/tx/0x01900c31…9bb34b

https://bscscan.com/tx/0x2dbc7bf0…c3b2fa

https://bscscan.com/tx/0x107de0ba…73c391

Incident Report

Protocol / Project Ploutoz Finance
Date of Incident
Attack Technique Flash Loan Attack
Classification Other
Primary Source View Post-Mortem

Protocol Information

Protocol Type Lending
Affected Token PTZ
Official Website www.ploutoz.finance/
Protocol Twitter/X @ploutozfinance/photo
Team Anonymous
Source Code Unverified

Market Context at Time of Hack

Token Categories
Asset Management Solana Ecosystem

What the Attacker Needed to Succeed

Understanding the prerequisites for this type of attack helps auditors identify protocols that are most at risk and helps developers build better defenses.

Technical Knowledge Deep understanding of flash loan attack and Solidity and EVM internals
Capital Required Flash loan capital (borrowed atomically, zero upfront cost)
On-Chain Access Ability to interact with smart contracts and deploy a custom exploit contract
Protocol Analysis Identification of the exploitable vulnerability in Ploutoz Finance's contract logic - root cause: other
Execution Speed Precise transaction ordering and timing to exploit the vulnerability within a single atomic block
Obfuscation Plan A strategy to launder and move stolen funds - typically through mixers, cross-chain bridges, or decentralized DEX swaps to resist tracing

What Auditors Should Check

Could this have been caught in audit? Yes — skilled auditors routinely flag Flash Loan Attack vulnerabilities in code review
Audited by Audit Report 1, Audit Report 2, Audit Report 3 — still lost $372K. Prior audits don't guarantee safety, especially after post-audit code changes.

If you're auditing a protocol with similar architecture to Ploutoz Finance, these are the critical security checks that could have prevented this incident (November 2021).

  • Verify all logic paths related to Flash Loan Attack are guarded by proper access controls and input validation - see the Flash Loans Attacks attack class for patterns
  • Review privileged functions (owner, admin, governance) for potential abuse vectors - centralization risks should be documented and bounded with timelocks or multi-sigs

Master these auditing techniques with hands-on labs and real exploit scenarios in the Smart Contract Hacking course.

Free Trial

Security Audit History

Related Attack Classes

The technique used in this hack maps to these vulnerability classes in our security curriculum:

See all Flash Loans Attacks examples →

Sources & References

Learn to Prevent the Next Ploutoz Finance

The Ploutoz Finance hack is one of many attacks that skilled auditors are trained to detect before deployment. Master real exploit patterns and defense techniques with hands-on Web3 security training.

Recreate exploit patterns safely Free Trial