🥇
Terra Classic
$40.00B
Most Expensive Crypto Hacks Leaderboard
The biggest Web3 and DeFi exploits ranked by amount lost. Track high-impact incidents, study attack patterns, and learn how security failures scale into multi-million dollar losses.
-
$91B+
Total Value Lost
-
3595
Incidents Tracked
-
141
Chains Affected
-
65
$100M+ Incidents
Top 10 Biggest Hacks
Where the Largest Losses Concentrate
Top Chains by Losses
Top Techniques by Losses
Full Leaderboard
Showing 1951-2000 of 3595 ranked incidents
| Rank | Project | Amount Lost | Date | Chain | Technique | Attack Guide | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1951 | AkiInuToken | $34K | - | Rugpull | — | View → | |
| 1952 | Yearnspace | $34K | ethereum | Rugpull | — | View → | |
| 1953 | Loop X Network | $34K | - | Rugpull | — | — | |
| 1954 | MinterPro | $34K | binance | Rugpull | — | View → | |
| 1955 | fren | $34K | - | Rugpull | — | — | |
| 1956 | MFT | $34K | bsc | Unknown | — | — | |
| 1957 | Kickboxer Tate | $33K | - | Rugpull | — | View → | |
| 1958 | SpaceID | $33K | - | Rugpull | — | View → | |
| 1959 | Zodiac Credit | $33K | - | Rugpull | — | View → | |
| 1960 | Sharwa.Finance | $33K | arbitrum | Spot Price Manipulation | Oracle Manipulation & Price Manipulation | — | |
| 1961 | KHABY Fan Token | $33K | - | Rugpull | — | View → | |
| 1962 | Moonco.in | $33K | - | Rugpull | — | View → | |
| 1963 | GPU | $32K | bsc | Arithmetic Error | — | — | |
| 1964 | MTI Finance | $32K | ethereum | Rugpull | — | View → | |
| 1965 | APEMAGA | $32K | ethereum | Unknown | — | — | |
| 1966 | FlyghtLite | $32K | - | Rugpull | — | View → | |
| 1967 | AutoTrade Finance | $32K | ethereum | Honeypot | — | View → | |
| 1968 | Nemo Finance | $32K | ethereum | Honeypot | — | View → | |
| 1969 | AK1111 | $32K | bsc | Improper Access Control | Access Control Attacks | — | |
| 1970 | My Farm Pet | $31K | - | Flash Loan Attack | Flash Loan Attacks | View → | |
| 1971 | 3913 token | $31K | - | Flash Loan Attack | Flash Loan Attacks | View → | |
| 1972 | Reaper Finance | $31K | ethereum | Rugpull | — | View → | |
| 1973 | n00dleswap | $31K | ethereum | Reentrancy | Reentrancy | View → | |
| 1974 | Apollo Swap | $31K | ethereum | Honeypot | — | View → | |
| 1975 | dYdX V3 | $31K | ethereum | DNS Hijack | — | — | |
| 1976 | BTC20Token | $30K | - | Flash Loan Attack | Flash Loan Attacks | View → | |
| 1977 | NONAME | $30K | ethereum | Rugpull | — | — | |
| 1978 | WOLF Protocol | $30K | ethereum | Rugpull | — | View → | |
| 1979 | HermesVault | $30K | algorand | Other / Withdrawal Logic Flaw | — | View → | |
| 1980 | BONK Fun | $30K | solana | DNS Hijack | — | — | |
| 1981 | Omnipus | $30K | ethereum | Missing Input Validation | — | — | |
| 1982 | QuillDex | $30K | - | Rugpull | — | View → | |
| 1983 | APPLE | $30K | - | Rugpull | — | View → | |
| 1984 | Revert Finance | $30K | ethereum | Abandoned / Arbitrary External Call | Access Control Attacks | View → | |
| 1985 | DOXED | $30K | - | Rugpull | — | View → | |
| 1986 | Wiener DOGE | $30K | bsc | Rounding Error | — | — | |
| 1987 | Doodled Dragons | $30K | - | Rugpull | — | View → | |
| 1988 | Atomic Green | $30K | arbitrum | Signature Replay | — | View → | |
| 1989 | Unidark | $30K | ethereum | Rugpull | — | View → | |
| 1990 | DiceSwap | $30K | binance | Rugpull | — | View → | |
| 1991 | wDAO EON | $29K | - | Flash Loan Attack | Flash Loan Attacks | View → | |
| 1992 | RETAWATCH | $29K | - | Rugpull | — | View → | |
| 1993 | Vista Finance | $29K | bsc | Flash Loan Attack / Incorrect Share Accounting | Flash Loan Attacks | View → | |
| 1994 | YYS | $29K | - | Flash Loan Attack | Flash Loan Attacks | View → | |
| 1995 | FPR | $29K | bsc | Improper Access Control | Access Control Attacks | — | |
| 1996 | Yzer Token | $29K | - | Rugpull | — | View → | |
| 1997 | Dragonswap | $29K | binance | Rugpull | — | View → | |
| 1998 | ASKACR Token | $29K | - | Flash Loan Attack | Flash Loan Attacks | View → | |
| 1999 | ProjectX | $28K | - | Rugpull | — | View → | |
| 2000 | Float Protocol | $28K | ethereum | Spot Price Manipulation | Oracle Manipulation & Price Manipulation | — |
Data sourced from DefiLlama & SunWeb3Sec/DeFiHackLabs . Thank you for keeping Web3 security data open.
Understanding the Pattern Behind Billion-Dollar Losses
The most expensive crypto hacks are not random. They cluster around repeating vulnerability patterns: access-control failures, flash-loan manipulation, oracle abuse, and unsafe external calls. Studying large-loss incidents helps security researchers prioritize high-impact threat models first.
For deeper context, explore the full Web3 Hacks Dashboard and our Smart Contract Attack Library for hands-on exploit and mitigation breakdowns.
Frequently Asked Questions
How is this leaderboard ranked?
Incidents are ranked by parsed USD amount lost in descending order. Records without parseable loss values are excluded from this ranking.
Does this include every attack type?
It includes all incidents with known loss values in the database. Use the full dashboard for broader filtering and lower-severity incidents.
How can I learn to prevent these exploits?
Study attack-class pages first, then practice in guided exercises inside the Smart Contract Hacking course.
Learn to Prevent High-Impact Smart Contract Hacks
$91B+ lost to preventable vulnerabilities. Master real exploit patterns and defense techniques with hands-on Web3 security training.
Start your free security training
Get 25 free lessons and 4 guided exploit exercises.
Onboarding details by email within 2–3 business days.